Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 297 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Greg
      Post count: 397

      Is it safe to assume that we are going to consider other options besides the offerings from Attitash, Bretton Woods, and Loon? I’d like to follow-up with these folks as a courtesy.

      Greg
        Post count: 397

        Unfortunately, I don’t think I’ll be able to attend a post-flags gathering. Since opportunities to hike with my brother are somewhat limited these days, we are going to do a multi-day backpack or basecamping trip around the flags event. Chances are I’ll be camped out somewhere in the Pemi after flagging South Twin. I will be there in spirit though and I’m glad to have had an opportunity to meet some of you at the planning meeting.

        Greg
          Post count: 397
          in reply to: Backup teams #49684

          @Frodo wrote:

          I like both Stephen’s and SilentCal’s suggestions, so why not combine the two?

          Certain people who have already signed up might not want other hikers to join them, so to allow other hikers to join without their permission might not be fair.

          What about this, once all of the peaks are officially taken, email all of the primary flagbearers and ask if it is ok for other interested hikers to join them.

          Generate a new sign-up list for participating (the word backup might deter people) hikers. Then we promote to the popular regional websites, and allow all to participate for the peaks that are willing to accept company.

          For each peaks organizational details, follow up with detailed discussions in the forums or email.

          One thing that we can’t take for granted is that just because all of the peaks are taken on the sign-up form that everything will turn out. In 2001, 11 people signed up to climb Liberty, and only 6 showed. In 2002, all 48 peaks were taken, yet only 39 were confirmed. In 2003, 40 peaks were taken with 37 confirmed.

          This year, on the 3rd anniversary, lets make the White Mountains, America, the veterans who sacrifice for our freedom, and all of the people who lost loved ones on Sept, 11, 2001 proud by covering them ALL…

          All great thoughts, Frodo. I thinks it’s a perfect approach.

          BTW, kudos to you for being able to put a 2001 entry in your sig. You truly are one of the catalysts of this whole thing… :beer:

          Greg
            Post count: 397

            @Stephen wrote:

            Well, there’s always the fact that coberg’s site got more than both AZ and VFTT combined! 😛

            :angry:

            😉

            Greg
              Post count: 397

              @Stephen wrote:

              Don’t worry Greg. You beat out VFTT soundly…

              Ha. I feel better… 😉

              Greg
                Post count: 397

                @Stephen wrote:

                1033: http://www.hike-nh.com/
                437: http://search.msn.com/
                312: http://www.viewsfromthetop.com/
                311: http://forums.alpinezone.com/
                221: http://appalachia.outdoors.org/
                209: http://hike-nh.com/

                Damn! VFTT beat AZ by one. 😆 but at least I topped AMC. 😉 Nice job on the referrals Chris O!

                Greg
                  Post count: 397
                  in reply to: Backup teams #49677

                  Sounds fine to me. Just be careful as to what info gets sent to the primary (probably just hiker name, right?).

                  I think there’s a difference between full coverage of registered peaks, and those that will actually get a flag on 9/11. I think with this “backup teams” approach there’s a better chance to acheive actual full coverage.

                  Greg
                    Post count: 397

                    Has anyone posted info on FOT48 anywhere? I haven’t seen posts on VFTT or AMC. It’s pretty amazing that we’re down to only four peaks (not counting reserved peaks) if it was all word of mouth.

                    Greg
                      Post count: 397
                      in reply to: Almost halfway! #49658

                      @smitty77 wrote:

                      I’m wondering if the “Reserved” status should be grayed-out or put in a different font color altogether so that your eyes don’t automatically skip over them when browsing the list (which I find myself doing every time I look at it).

                      I totally agree. I do the same thing. Perhaps link “Reserved” to the Q&A or forum, or special sign-up form.

                      Greg
                        Post count: 397
                        in reply to: Almost halfway! #49656

                        Only 4 more, sans the “reserved” peaks? :blink:

                        Greg
                          Post count: 397

                          So I heard from BW. She indicated there’s not much that can be done at the ski area proper as it’s basically shut down at that time of year. However, one option is Stickney’s Restaurant in the Hotel with a BBQ at $29.50++ per person. They would need a guaranteed number at least 30 days prior to 9/11.

                          Another option mentioned was the Highland Center: 603-278-4453. The Group Sales Manager is Eric Jackel – extension 2003.

                          Please let me know if you think I should pursue any of the ski area options further.

                          Greg
                            Post count: 397

                            @MichaelJ wrote:

                            Additionally, those with peaks “taken” can chime in that others are welcome to come along. This can be in the same or individual threads.

                            Here’s a thought. How about creating a “Peaks” Forum here where we can have 48 threads, each one specific to a peak. Then, maybe on the Peaks list we can add a link to the thread for others that want to also cover said peak.

                            I will post a sticky thread on AZ this morning.

                            Greg
                              Post count: 397

                              Okay. Here is the response for Loon:

                              @Loon wrote:

                              You have a couple of options along the route of the BBQ.
                              Would you like to pay a lump sum for a specific number of people (give or take a few)?
                              Or would you prefer we offer and a-la-cart style BBQ with each individual paying for him/herself?
                              Loon would require a $500 room fee with the a-la-cart option.
                              A cash beer/wine bar can be set up without a problem, however if you wish us to provide liquor please let me know in advance as I must extend our liquor license for that day.

                              The contact from Attitash also indicated they could do a per head dinner. I’m still waiting for more info on some options at Bretton Woods.

                              No matter which way we go, I believe there is going to be a pre-paid amount needed. Any thoughts on how to handle that?

                              Greg
                                Post count: 397
                                in reply to: Almost halfway! #49650

                                @Outtabreath wrote:

                                Owls Head ,, hmmm maybe that’s the way to go. Will they carry up the wings?? :beer:

                                Great idea! Owl’s Head bait.

                                Greg
                                  Post count: 397
                                Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 297 total)